Make your own free website on

Home Page . . . .

green check New and/or Noteworthy . . . .

2014 Achievement Level Scores for SBAC vs. NAEP (for SBAC  states) new item pic

The “Link” Between Education Spending and Student Performance: A Twisted Link new item pic

About Idaho's K-12 achievement and state education spending, 2000-2013 new item pic

Idaho's Class of 2013. NAEP reading proficiency percentages improved from the 4th grade to 8th grade to 12th grade, while NAEP mathematics proficiency percentages declined from the 4th grade to 8th grade to 12th grade.

NAEP 2013 State Grade 12 Pilot Results. All Idaho's results were released Wednesday, May 7, 2014.

green check School Improvement Surveys . . . .

The K-12 survey instruments for students, staff and parent offered here were developed, adapted, and/or revised by Oregon classroom teachers in the Albany and Ontario school districts from the mid-1980s to the early 1990s. They are not intended for commercial use. They are made available here for free use by educators who want to assemble "quick and dirty" data to support their school improvement decisions and program evaluations. No scoring service is currently available, but model printouts are provided to guide self-scoring.

Click "Surveys" on the navagaton bar for more information about the K-12 school improvement surveys: Opinion Survey for Students (OSS, Grades 6-12); Opinion Survey for Parents (OSP, Grades 6-12); Instructional Quality Survey (IQS, All Staff, K-12); Student Opinion Questionnaire (SOQ, Grades 1-9); and Parent Opinion Questionnaires (POQ, Grades 1-9).

green check School Reform in Idaho . . . .

Problems with Albertson's "Don't Fail Idaho" Media Campaign:

Other notes about school reform in Idaho:

Note: This website will use "neighborhood school" rather than "not-charter school" or "not-a-charter school" or "regular school" or "traditional school" when conducting and reporting comparative data analyses. 

green check NAEP . . . .

Widespread misuse of NAEP results promotes wariness of American public schools!

The “Link” Between Education Spending and Student Performance: A Twisted Link

NAEP Cup - Ten Years of ServiceMuch dissatisfaction with student achievement in public schools springs from the improper use of results from the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) to compare states or to "confirm" state testing results. The two most frequent abuses are (1) using NAEP scores based on student samples to rank order the fifty states and (2) comparing NAEP's 1990 stipulated definition of above-grade-level proficient with the state's 2001 "NCLB required" definition of at-grade-level proficient. To better understand these unnecessary and unfortunate errors, browse through these two short, peer-reviewed papers available online at . . . .
 PARE logo
2007 Using NAEP to Confirm State Test Results in the No Child Left Behind Act
2005 Please Don’t Use NAEP Scores to Rank Order the 50 States

Click "NAEP" on the navagation bar for more information about the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), how NAEP scores should be interpreted, and reports presenting Idaho's NAEP results.


green check Home Page Data Display . . . .

Idaho vs. Nation on Inflation Adjusted K-12 Per Pupil Expenditures: 2000-2011 

per pupil expenditures id vs us

In constant 2011 dollars (i.e., inflation-adjusted dollars):

Cornman, S.Q. (2013). Revenues and Expenditures for Public Elementary and Secondary Education: School Year 2010–11 (Fiscal Year 2011) (NCES 2013-342). Washington, D.C.: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved April 14, 2014, from

blue arrowThe above and past "Home Page Data Displays" are available as PDF files.

Top of Page  {30-SEP-2014}